was not a blockbuster hit and was never meant to
be. There was little hype or publicity about the film prior to its release,
so as not to tarnish the true intentions of Miller in making it. Its
arrival in Australia made no waves and did not last long in the cinema.
This film was completed and released in 1992 U.S (1993 Aust and the rest of the
world). It was distributed by the large production company, Universal Pictures
U.S - having also distributed another Miller film, Babe in 1995. As
there are no George Miller interviews to be found (in English at least) the
actual writing of the story and division of tasks amongst the crew cannot be
exposed.
Lorenzo's Oil was shot largely in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Other
scenes were filmed in the Comoro Islands, and a small part was filmed inside
the Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This film is
largely an American film - see
Position of Australian Film and Value.
Previous Works
Lorenzo's Oil was something of a milestone for director, George
Miller. The Queensland-born doctor and film-maker has put his name to an
abundance of previous and preceeding movies since Lorenzo's Oil. The
most famous of his works would have to be the Mad Max trilogy.
Mad Max, 1979 was the second film directed by Miller, and undoubtedly put
him on the map in the world of movie-making. Mad Max was followed by
Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior, 1981, and Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome
,1985. Miller wrote, produced and directed all three Mad Max films
with the exception of the first, which he co-wrote with James McCausland.
Amongst Miller's major title are The Twilight Zone, the Movie 1983 (directed).
The Witches of Eastwick 1987 (directed). The Year My Voice Broke
1987, (produced). Dead Calm, 1989 (produced).
Babe 1995 (wrote and produced). Babe:Pig in the City 1998
(wrote, produced and directed).
Miller also tried his hand in the television industry for the most
part of the eighties. He produced a number of television series and mini-
series from 1983 - "The Dismissal" to 1989 - "Bangkok Hilton".
What is most different about Miller's work on Lorenzo's Oil is
its classification as an American film. After years of working for the most
part with Australian actors (Mel Gibson and Nicole Kidman are still claimed
as Australia's depsite their Hollywood success), Miller's production
of this film (and indeed The Witches of Eastwick)took a step in a
different direction. The cast of Lorenzo's
Oil is striclty American, it was filmed in the States and one can only
speculate that it was funded using American dollars. Despite this, the film
remains on his list of credits and was a filmic milestone for Miller
personally.
It is also interesting to note that Susan Sarandon was used for The
Witches of Eastwick as well as Lorenzo's Oil. It not uncommon for
directors to form patterns in their choice of cast - ie Quentin Tarantino and
Tim Burton.
Position of Australian Film and Value
What is perhaps most important to study in this arena is the placement of
this film in the Australian Industry. We must question what makes a film
Australian? For some it is the nationality of the actors and director, for
others it is where the film is shot, or perhaps even where the funding came
from. I was delighted to find an entry for Lorenzo's Oil on the
AusFilms website (momentary triumph after many searching failures).
Reviewer Peter Ryan stated: "Here's another film [Lorenzo's Oil] sometimes touted as
Australian (e.g. in 'Australian Film 1978-94'), despite the fact that the
only Australian connection in the story was a mention of it as one of the
countries contributing to membership of the foundation set up by the
families of the sufferers from the disease... The Australian label was no
doubt claimed as a result of the strong creative input to the film by
our mob." (no date given.)
What Ryan is mockingly saying here is that the film to him, just
scrapes by as Australian due to the high proportion of the crew from Australia.
However, the director alone does not determine the so-called nationality of a
film. For example, had director Roberto Benigni filmed his award-winning
masterpiece Life is Beautiful in California, using Halle Berry and
Denzel Washington in its leading roles, would it still have been named a
foreign film? No...quite obviously. The nationality of the director is simply
information, trivia - it does not affect the labelling of a film.The fact that
Lorenzo's Oil wasn't released in Australia until 2 months
after it had come out in the states is undeniable evidence of its Americanism.
There is a certain irony involved in studying Lorenzo's Oil in a
unit concerned with Australian Cinema. I believe however, that it is important
to examine the work of the director, regardless of the nationality of its
actors. Lorenzo's Oil is a good example of the talent of George
Miller, the rest is unimportant.
It is fair to state that this film has no position and very little
value on the Australian market. It does not depict our way of life,
our country has no real place
in Australian cinema despite its director. The international appeal of this
film was quite large and it was widely received around the world.
Lorenzo's Oil was released in Argentina, France, Spain, Finland,
Sweden and Germany - as well as Australia and U.S.A
Australian National Cinema as a Medium-Sized
English language cinema.
Australian cinema is often described as being medium-sized English-language
cinema. Tom O'Regan's work on Australian National Cinema (1996) has
explain this to mean that the Australian industry of films only takes a small
place on the great national stage, and is often dwarfed by the huge following
of American films.
Once again, Lorenzo's Oil was produced largely for Americans, by
Americans. It is often mocked for its lack of success on the Hollywood
blockbuster front, however it silently maintains some nobility as being a
strong and influential production, despite the waining Box Office figures.
Attempting to place this film in the national cinema as a medium-sized English
-language cinema is an exercise in futility. It belong first and foremost in
the large-sized English language cinema - Hollywood. O'Regan speaks of
the 'antipodal-ness' of Australian cinema (OâRegan 1996, p.106), in that it must
tread the line
between being distinctly Australian and being comfortably familiar enough to
be accepted by Hollywood. Take for example the huge American following of Peter
Faiman's Crocodile Dundee. This film is brimming with Australian cliches
and Paul Hogan's cringe-inducing accent may grate the nerves after a bit,
however, the American audience found this film fresh and exciting - and
apparently hilarious. What may seem like a distortion of the 'norm' for
Australians is seen as a brilliant cultural spoof for Americans. That excite
ment and adventure side of this film familiar to them, while at the same time
the film itself represented a whole new genre of Australian Comedy.
Lorenzo's Oil does not tread this line for the simple reason that it
is already accepted by the large-sized cinema as an American film. Its main
actors, Sarandon and Nolte and multi-millionaires after years of 'making it
big-time' in Hollywood.
George Miller's film
Lorenzo's Oil has no place in the medium-
sized English language cinema, nor for that matter in the Australian Cinema.
Its market value is, and always has been, measured in American dollars,
despite its Australian director.
References
Books
- Murray, Scott (editor) 1994. Australian Cinema. p 149, 164. Allen & Unwin, in association with the Australian
Film Commission. Australia.
- OâRegan, T. 1996, Australian National Cinema. p 106. Routledge, London.
Internet Resources